Hong Kong Liberal Religious Forum

Adolf von Harnack: liberal theology at its height
http://books.google.com.hk/books?id=QSq ... 23&f=false



Adolf von Harnack vs Karl Barth (in Chinese)

神学的本质：启示（神本）的或科学（人本）的？ ——重访巴特和哈纳克的公开辩论 - [系统神学]
古吟声
2007-05-04
上帝就是上帝 God is God, but World is World
http://christgu.blogbus.com/logs/5255162.html



Alex's comment:
Karl Barth's responses are assertions without proofs, which makes them unconvincing. I would like to ask Barth: What is the definition of "revelation"? What is the scope of "revelation"? How to prove that "revelation" really exists?
The title of the Chinese article reads: "The Nature of Theology: Revelation (of God) or Science (of Man)?"
I would ask: Is the nature of Flying Spaghetti Monster theology revelation (of Flying Spaghetti Monster) or Science (of Man)?
巴特的回答只有斷言，缺乏論證，因此缺乏說服力。問巴特：「啟示」的定義是甚麼？「啟示」的範圍是甚麼？如何證實「啟示」的確存在？
「飛行意粉怪」神学的本质：「飛行意粉怪」启示（「飛行意粉怪」本）的或科学（人本）的？